Text full multimedia monochrome

First time here?

Find out more about how The Lecture List works.

Coronavirus situation update

Our lecture organisers may or may not have had time to update their events with cancellation notices. Clearly social gatherings are to be avoided and that includes lectures. STAY AT HOME FOLKS, PLEASE.

Help!

Find out what you can do to keep The Lecture List online

The Democracy Club: Political Nomadism in India

The struggle between the fence and the field in a representative democracy


As democracy has become a part of the commonsense of politics in India it has had to reinvent itself. This is because the processes of deepening, that have been underway over the last six decades, have meant that the new groups, interests and imaginations that have entered politics have begun to challenge the terms of the conventional relationship between the institutions of democracy and of its processes, between the fence and the field.
One of the areas where the challenge is most lively is with respect to defections, a phenomenon where representatives after being elected shift allegiances from one party to another. This phenomenon, called political nomadism in several countries, strikes at the very roots of the parliamentary order, such as the party and electoral system, cabinet government etc. While such political nomadism may be dismissed, within a conventional discourse, as an example of the distortions that have crept into democratic practice as it takes root outside the West (the problem of identifying the standard from which deviations can be measured comes in here) within a subaltern discourse it may be seen as perfectly acceptable as democracy itself gets democratised. This challenge of the relationship between the fence and the field requires the attention of political theorists on at least three issues: (i) on the idea of ‘representation’, on what is entailed by it and when can one say that an impermissible departure has taken place, (ii) on the effectiveness of institutions to discipline political behaviour and produce in such behaviour the commitment to the values of the institution, and (iii) on the issue of political judgement in an ethically plural democracy, one that is so necessary to take the democratic transformation of these societies forward.


Speaker(s):

Professor Peter Ronald deSouza | talks | www

 

Date and Time:

21 June 2005 at 6:00 pm

Duration:

2 hours 30 minutes

 

Venue:

Centre for the Study of Democracy
32-38 Wells Street
5th Floor
London
W1T 3UW
02079115138
http://www.wmin.ac.uk/csd

More at Centre for the Study of Democracy...

 

Tickets:

Free

Available from:

Additional Information:

For further details, please contact the Democracy Club at democracy-club@wmin.ac.uk

Register to tell a friend about this lecture.

Comments

If you would like to comment about this lecture, please register here.



 

Any ad revenue is entirely reinvested into the Lecture List's operating fund