Find out more about how The Lecture List works.
Coronavirus situation updateOur lecture organisers may or may not have had time to update their events with cancellation notices. Clearly social gatherings are to be avoided and that includes lectures. STAY AT HOME FOLKS, PLEASE. |
Find out what you can do to keep The Lecture List online
|
Does this represent a dangerous retreat from politics as a contest of ideas and an attempt by politicians to outsource responsibility? And what would a progressive 21st century drugs policy look like?
Hard Nutt to crack: do we want an evidence-based drugs policy?
When David Nutt was sacked as the governmentâs chief drugs tsar for questioning its policies on drug classification, it seemed like another case of expertise being sacrificed by cowardly politicians. Alan Johnsonâs decision to remove Nutt for âcampaigning against government policyâ led two other advisers to resign in protest, and nearly caused a mass rebellion of scientists. For some, Nutt has been punished for merely confirming what many already suspect: that illegal drugs are not as harmful as their legal counterparts such as alcohol and nicotine, and that drug policy is underpinned by moral concerns and tabloid appeal rather than scientific evidence.
Some commentators argue, however, that in a democracy it's politicians who are elected to made decisions and not their scientific advisors. Furthermore, thereâs nothing wrong with politicians basing judgement on morality. Meanwhile, Nutt's supporters point out the government is only happy to use scientific evidence when it suits them.
What lies behind the rise of evidence-based policy-making? Is it a more mature, scientific and reasoned approach to important questions, which transcends petty party politics and personal opinion? Or does this represent a dangerous retreat from politics as a contest of ideas and an attempt by politicians to outsource responsibility? And what would a progressive 21st century drugs policy look like?
Speaker:
Tony Gilland, Science and Society Director, Institute of Ideas
Suggested readings:
This ârevolt of the expertsâ is revolting Brendan OâNeill spiked 2 November 2009 http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7661/
Drugs: Prejudice and political weakness have rejected scientific facts Observer 1 November 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/01/david-nutt-drugs-sacking
Donât forget: cannabis comes from ruthless, violent men Tom Whipple The Times 31 October 2009 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6897378.ece
LSD less dangerous than alcohol, says governmentâs drugs adviser The Times 29 October 2009 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article6894710.ece
For the public good, set the science free Tom Addiscott Manifesto Club 2009 http://www.manifestoclub.com/thinkpieces
Speaker(s): |
|
|
|
Date and Time: |
12 November 2009 at 7:00 pm |
Duration: | 2 hours |
|
|
Venue: |
The Perseverance |
Organised by: |
Institute of Ideas |
|
|
Tickets: |
Free |
Available from: |
RSVP by emailing: currentaffairs@instituteofideas.com |
Additional Information: |
http://www.currentaffairs.org.uk |
Register to tell a friend about this lecture.
If you would like to comment about this lecture, please register here.
Any ad revenue is entirely reinvested into the Lecture List's operating fund